THAT CAUSED THE LADY TO WRITE
HER OUTRAGEOUS EMAIL THAT WILL BE DISMEMBERED HER>MEMO 18/ 8/
2015...I DO NOT KNOW WHATI MEANT - BUT SURELY IT WAS
NOT INTENDED TO BE HARMFUL IN ANY
WAY!!!
AND YOU GUYS THOUGHT TO ADVISE
ME TO SEEK LEGAL ADVICE!!
Subject: THE BELOW HAS BEEN REWRITTEN MERELY FOR CLARITY....DEAR
NICK AND CATHOLIC CARE
‘THIS HAS BEEN REWRITTEN MERELY FOR CLARITY....DEAR NICK AND CATHOLIC
CARE’
FROM LATE LAST NIGHT’S VERSION WHICH HAS
BEEN PULPED
Dear people of Catholic Care
Kindly note that the previous email sent to you
people was plainly in need of an edit.
This is being done herewith.
Please note that the original will be ‘pulped’ as
soon as this edited version which is BEING REWRITTEN MERELY FOR CLARITY – is
posted on my ‘confidential’ blog.
As in my
previous email of August 13, I will try to be helpful so you do not need to go
for assistance to your Jill LaneManager of Quality and Risk | CatholicCare
OR TO YOUR
LEGAL PEOPLE. THEY ARE NO HELP TO YOU,
You should
also please note the following.
It is
expected that it will be realized by those who will be taking action as a result
of my submissions that your actions and non – actions have
been so pathetic / egregious and a ‘thesaurus – full’ of EQUALLY - VALID
descriptors that I can never accurately clarify all or even most of
them.
Probably
unwisely this aggrieved grandfather has tried.
Note that
almost certainly this will be the last email I send you: and you are no doubt
grateful to think this could be the end of my astonishing
scribbles.
One more
thing: I am sure people will cope with my interminable change of fonts, strange
structure and bizarre punctuation.
Yea – I
know the stylists will claim ‘I AM SHOUTING’ et al.
Guess what: I AM!!! What would any person with blood still coursing
through his veins do? I try to add another dimension to the pain your outrages
have caused us.
MAY YOU NEVER KNOW THIS PAIN:
BUT MAY YOU COME TO UNDERSTAND IT IN THE PROCESS OF BEING HELD TO ACCOUNT IN
THIS POST – MODERN WORLD!
May your children and
grandchildren say onto you: SHAME ON YE ALL!
So I
continue my editing hereunder, with little attempt to change my
style.
This is
written in part in satiric / parodic format because other parties are
investigating this matter.
There may
even be a touch of sarcasm: at least I will put a smile on their visages.They
deserve to have a bit of fun given the multifarious evil that Catholic Care and Howard Zeimer have
concocted between themselves.
Surely this
is OK by you: none of the above diminishes the naturally - helpful person I have
always been.
NOTE the
simple suggestions here for you and Catholic Care.
First -
sack the pair and dissociate yourself from the woman who wrote the adulterated
tripe on 13 July. I decided to give you and your legal advisers a lesson in
clear thinking and plainly demonstrate through only this epistle the plain
rubbish in your communications are sadly inept.
Be grateful that basically only this
atrocious email of hers is being analysed to ‘depth.’ there are dozens – nay
scores of gigantian failures of your persons – all resident in my
writings.
Pathetically with Alan Baker – your
solicitor’s sanction [ the dictionary is pathetically ambiguous on the sanction
word – did your people create this problem as well?
Some – including my analysis of your own
documents – the so – called yellow papers – remain partially complete; only
approx 90% ...
While you are about it re – read this – it
was the email that caused Nick to panic: per his contacting Jill – she being the
Manager of Quality and Risk | CatholicCare
It was
plainly the legal advise by your IN HOUSE SOLICITOR ALAN BAKER, GIVEN TO THE
HAPLESS. HOPELESSLY INEPT AND WORSE - ELIZABETH JENKINS -
THAT
CAUSED THE LADY TO WRITE HER OUTRAGEOUS EMAIL THAT WILL BE DISMEMBERED
HER>MEMO 18/ 8/ 2015...I DO NOT KNOW WHATI MEANT - BUT SURELY IT WAS NOT INTENDED TO BE HARMFUL IN ANY WAY!!!
AND YOU
GUYS THOUGHT TO ADVISE ME TO SEEK LEGAL ADVICE!!
I REPEAT: MOST OF THIS ARGUABLE JUSTIFIED ‘DIATRIBE’ IS LARGELY BASED
ex her email of 13 July as below link again.
Tell me people:
AS PER THIS EMAIL: WHO CAUSED HER TO IMPLY – AND EFFECTIVELY SEEK SUCCOUR IN –
THE IDEA SUGGESTING / PRE EMPTING THAT THE MATTER IS BEING TAKEN TO THE COURTS
BY US? IT IS NOT FOR YOU TO CLOAK YOURSELF WITH TAINTED CLAIMS OF INNOCENCE
BASIS THAT YOU WILL NOT BE HELD TO ACCOUNT BECAUSE [MERELY] YOU THINK YOU CAN /
WILL BE ABLE TO DENOUNCE MY ACCUSATIONS BASIS YOUR RUSE TO PROTECT
YOURSELF VIA VARIOUS CHARADES OF CHICANERY. Phew. See your various buzzword
excuses attempting legalaise to cover fraud!
PRIVACY
In the best
interest of the child.
Not our role to
take sides
Profoundness
that is merely recondite.
I WISH I HAD TIME TO LIST ALL YOUR PENURIOUS,EXIGUOUS CLAIMS OF SWEET INNOCENCE.
You could for
example be under investigation by parties not related to the Family
Court.
OR BY THE
FAMILY COURT THEMSELVES! OR OTHER ENTITIES!!!!
ARE YOU
SERIOUSLY SUGGESTING THAT YOU WILL NOT HAVE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU MERELY
SHOW A 'NICE FACE' TO THE INVESTIGATORS IN WHATEVER FORUMSMY PROCESSES FINISH IN? AND
THERE ARE PLENTY....
OR FOR EXAMPLE:
MERELY CONTEMPLATE THAT THE ATTORNEY - GENERAL MAY 'HEAR' OF THIS FIASCO -
SEVERE UNDERSTATEMENT!!! More like a tragedy! HOW DO YOU GO REFUSING TO ANSWER
THE AG'S STAFF? PROSECUTORS?YOU
PEOPLE AND ZEIMER HAVE ACTED IN A WAY THAT MUST ELICIT INTEREST FROM VARIOUS LAW
– BASED ENTITIES!THUS YOUR FEAR EXPRESSED
BY YOU VIA ACCIDENTAL RELEASE TO ME OF YOUR RESPONSE FROM JILL!!
AND OTHER
ENTITIES WILL BE INVOLVED.
BY THE WAY: HOW
DO YOU / DID YOU DARE SUGGEST IN THIS LETTER / EMAIL THAT YOU PLAINLY DO? SEE
BELOW. HOW DARE YOU BE SO STUPID? AND / TO THINK I AM. ?TO THINK OTHERS READING
THIS ARE! Indeed the very nature of saying to us what Zeimer said to you is
plainly illegal in the strange chimeric world of CATHOLIC
CARE. INNATELY YOU DID INDEED COMMUNICATE. AND
PATHETICALLY YOU SEEK TO PROTECT YOURSELVES FROM THE MULTIPLE OUTRAGES THAT EVEN
YOU CAN SEE INDUBITABLY FLOW FROM YOUR – SAY DELIBERATEIGNORING OF ABUSE OF CHILDREN – BREAKING OF THE LAW BY DOCUMENTS FRAUD
BY ZEIMER’S SOLICITORS – BREAKING OF THE LAW IN ALLOWING ZEIMER TO PRE EMPT THE
OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS IN NOT KEEPING TO THE COURT ACCESS GRANTED US – AND
INDEED YOU HAVE TO ASK WHY THE SHAM OF ASKING TO SEE THE COURT ORDERS IF YOU
DELIBERATELY IGNORED ZEIMER & CO DELIBERATE FRAUD? SEE BELOW. THERE IS NO
END TO THIS DEFACTO CRIMINALITY FLOWING FROM ZEIMER – EXECUTED BY GADENS – AND
FORMALLY WHITEWASHED BY CATHOLIC CARE. JENKINS: ALL VIA HER ‘’PRIVILEGED’’
CLAIM!! Shame on you all -
all of you know all of this. All of you defend theindefensible.
Shame is the wrong word; on
the one hand shame understates it, stupidity diminishes it – and the law
lacerates it! AND THE PROCESSES OPEN TO ME WILL SURELY VINDICATE ALL
THIS!
AND IT WAS DULY PASSED ON TO US
VERBALLY .. AND BAD LUCK FOR YOU IT WAS DULY RECORDED BY MYSELF IN THESE FILES:
THE COROLARY ALSO INDICTS YE ALL - IN THAT NOTHING I HAVE WRITTEN CAN BE DENIED!
Make sure you understand this next time you decide on defacto criminality:
attempt to deny the worst aspects – seek to ameliorate the average aspects by
early admissions and surely hope and
pray to whoever is your supreme authoritythat you never meet the likes of ME
AGAIN!!!!!!!
I GO BACK TO
JENKINS’ EMAIL. REALLY!.......’ANYTHING SAID ANY OF THE PARTIES CANNOT BE USED
AT ANY TIME? UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES? GET REAL - THAT IS NOT BASICALLY TRUE! OR
REMOTELY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SITUATION FLOWING FROM MERELY THIS DOCUMENT AND
ALL ELSE! SIMPLY, ALSO - CANNOT BE TRUE! SURELY SO. Probably the worst is the
infantile idea arising from the fact that YOU DARE NOT VERIFY WHAT
ONE OR OTHER PARTIES SAID IN THEIR COMMUNICATION TO EACH OTHER!
OH:
BY THE WAY .....HAVING FAILED TO DENY MY DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE PLAINLY TRUE!! SEE
16 here:
AND THE MOST ABSURD: THE VERY IDEA THAT YOU THINK
YOU WILL NOT BE ACCOUNTABLE BASIS THAT EVIDENCE EX THE INTERVIEW WILL NOT BE
ADMISSIBLE IN COURT! EVEN IF PARTLY [ETHEREALLY, or 'NETHEREALLY' CORRECT -
GIVEN THE MASSIVE OTHER PROTUBERANCES, YOU CANNOT HIDE FROM THE OTHER FRAUDS YOU
HAVE ALLOWED UNDER YOUR WATCH.. AND ACCORDINGLY YOU ARE GUILTY
OF GRAVELY MISREPRESENTING AND ABUSING THE LAW! SHAME ON YOU PEOPLE _ DO NOT
PLAY THESE MALFEASANT GAMES WITH ME... AND THE LAW!
AND:
AMAZINGLY NOTHING EXAGGERATED! See the rubbish emanating in all seriousness
from Liz Jenkins - quoting Zeimer: is this a demonstration of a ‘serious’ /
INDEED ANY!!! attempt at mediation?AND THIS MEGA - LUNACY VALIDATED BY
YOU!!! SEE YOUR OWN SO CALLED YELLOW PAPERS - quoted at length all herein
and other communications. Pure humbug - and outrage which the law will not
forgive!IS THERE ANY POINT IN
POSTING HERE ANYTHING MORE?? I COULD EASILY....
WHAT ARE YOU
AFRAID OF? INDEED THIS MANIFEST FEAR OF CONFIRMING MATTERS THAT YOU HAVE NOT
BEEN WILLING OR ABLE TO DENY IS PLAIN RISIBLE: IT IS SO PATHETICALLY TOO LATE
FOR THAT!
INDEED -
YOUR INEPTNESS GOES TO EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE: DO YOU THINK I AM A TRIFLE EXAGGERATING? LOOK AT IT
ANOTHER WAY: IF YOU HAD TRIED TO DENY ANYTHING OR EVERYTHING THAT NOW PLAINLY
THREATENS YOU - TELL ME WHAT REMAINS OF WHAT DR Z SAID TO YOU?
INDEED: you are a party to
Zeimer's fraud: what has he over you? I really do not understand how you could
be so 'careless' about your future.
IT IS OBVIOUS
THAT THIS IS A MERE CHARADE WHEREBY YOU ARE PATHETICALLY TRYING TO PROTECT
YOURSELVES FROM SERIOUS CHARGES?
EVEN IF THE SO
- CALLED COMMUNICATION WAS DELIBERATELY SO SEQUESTERED BY THE RULES< THE
PATHETIC WRITINGS BY CATHOLIC CARE WOULD HAVE BEEN MAKING SURE THAT NONE OF THE
PARTIES COULD REALLY COMMUNICATE> THIS IS UNFORGIVEABLE. And a mere gently -
expressed problem' sorry – this is repetition...
LOOK AT THE
LAME DEFENCE OF THIS BY NICK: IN HIS RECENT TORTUOUS IRRELEVANCY ON 10
AUGUST
POSSIBLY THE WORST IS THAT YOU ALLOWED ZEIMER TO
TAMPER WITH COURT DOCUMENTS - AND CALLED THE TAMPERED PAPERS THE CAUSES OF
ACTION BY ZEIMER YOU ATTEMPTED TO PROTECT AS ''PRIVILEGED''! For information of
fraud you allowed under your watch
see the below for background.
How can the Catholic Church be proud of what you did, allowed to be done,
and worse - protected said fraud by trying all sorts of ruses to mislead
me?
Yea I tell you: your derivated 'motherhood' / neo
-cliche phrases will become legitimate entries in Seidner's Modern Cliches. The
heroic efforts of Catholic Care will be surely be noted. CC practitioners
Elizabeth Jenkins and her partner Juon; the wearer of the beatified***1 look
were bad enough.
I want it noted that it is the defacto waffle,
outrageous evasion, plain abuse of process / law and deliberate lack of clear
thinking that 'gets' to me. WILFULL BLINDNESS in other words. It is a shame that
I sacrificed a great blog title............. in order to simplify matters for
the various stages / processes to follow.
However, solicitor Alan Baker and general manager
Nick were entrusted by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to fix this multifarious
mess.
........
And to say they made an unholy hash of coming to
terms with manifest fraudulent behaviour is being over - generous.
I met these gentlemen in their Malvern office and
sadly Alan B tried a classical media trick on me.
It did not work on this expert on the
genre!
........
And the rest: far too many 'THINGS' DELIBERATELY
MISSED.
FROM THE GENERAL TO THE SPECIFIC
Opportunities they have FAILED TO DEBUNK
AND NATURALLY, TYPICALLY THEY HAVE FAILED TO ADDRESS.
All the above can be seen and will be seen in any
significant study by others in different forums. I may not have time in these
confidential blogs to prepare a major defacto thesis on what CC have
done...
Subject: Request for information
from shuttle FDR on 7 July 2015
Dear Geoff,
Thank you for your email on Thursday 9
July 2015. I work part time, so my apologies for not responding earlier.
You made a
request for written information about some of what was said by Dr Zeimer in the
family dispute resolution session on 7 July 2015, which proceeded by way of
shuttle. I have discussed your request with our team leader, Alan Baker, who is
also a Lawyer and who provides us with internal legal
advice.
Because
of provisions in the Family Law Act relating to the confidentiality of the
family dispute resolution process (in particular, section 10H) and the
inadmissibility in Court of evidence of matters which are said in the process
(particularly section 10J), it is our practice to not provide the sort of
information you have requested. We passed on information to you during our
meeting of what Dr Zeimer had said. Now that the meeting is over, we are not
able to repeat or put in writing that information.
[GS: WHAT A LOAD OF GRATUITOUS RUBBISH IS
MERELY THE BELOW!!!]
The legal
position relating to the confidentiality and inadmissibility of the process was
summarised in the 4 page information sheet (“Family Dispute Resolution
Information”) provided to you at the outset of our engagement with you, and we
refer you back to that information.
"he launched
into a diatribe against the Catholic
Church"
Origin
late 16th century (denoting a
disquisition): from French, via Latin from Greek diatribē‘spending of time,
discourse’, from dia ‘through’ + tribein ‘rub’.
succour
ˈsʌkə/
noun
noun: sucor
1.
assistance and support in times of hardship and
distress.
help, aid, bring aid to, give help to, give/render assistance to, assist,lend a (helping) hand
to, be of service
to;
minister to, care for,comfort, bring comfort to, bring relief to, support, be
supportive of,sustain, protect, take care of, look after, attend to, serve, wait
on
"the Navy was
unable to succour colonies in
Africa"
