CC 25 Aug 4 A LIE BY ANY OTHER NAME IS FRAUD

From: g87

Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 3:25 PM

To: nick.collins@ccam.org.au

Subject: A LIE BY ANY OTHER NAME IS FRAUD

A LIE BY ANY OTHER NAME IS FRAUD

I now continue from yesterday's email / blog entry on the blog created just for these correspondences.
http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/



1
Kindly note the reason you are sent these emails.

It is to enable you to make comments on, add information to, agree with same or deny in part or whole anything therein.

OR MERELY APOLOGIZE FOR WHAT THAT WOMAN ELIZABETH JENKINS and partner J. HAS DONE OR FAILED TO DO.
AND OH - I NEARLY FORGOT.

1. YOU HAVE NOT ATTEMPTED TO DENY OR CONTRADICT OR IN ANY WAY DISPARAGE MY OBVIOUSLY - TRUTHFUL VERSION OF EVENTS.
2. Nor have you in any way apologized for her multiple malfeasances.

You must be aware that it is very likely that when perhaps soon  you issue a certificate C60 or whatever it is called, Howard Zeimer will surely then have the means of commencing actions in  the Family Court.

To finally initiate the process of eviscerating his children's loving grandparents.What pride he will be to his wife and his wife's loving family Kremnizer. It is not easy to do such evil and be commended for it.

Somehow the common refrain about 'the devil made me do it' seems apt.

Note carefully: his documents will surely reflect what the dear lady conveyed to us at our meeting on July 30 in your offices. Surely.

If not my people will want to know why not.

2

This blog enables interested  multiple intimate associates and friends to give me their intimate multiple thoughts and support.

And verily - if it was not for the tragedies she un - heroically tried to foist on us - it would be quite a read:  THE MOST EXCITING OF BLOGS. My regret is that it has taken too much of my time.

Has the thought occurred to you that the action I will take in responding to Zeimer's action will be devastating for the Catholic Church in general Catholic Care in particular.

[I always liked using that phrase - opportunities have been scarce over the last few years.]

REPEAT: it is not too late to apologize....etc.

The Family Court surely likes genuine, heartfelt apologies.

Sigh. I go on.

3
HOW DO / WILL I PROVE SHE LIED?
This is a mere pittance of a list.
Of course we are discussing her risibly -  inept claim that she acted on her own initiative to ensure the Zeimer entity was not needing to meet us. Thus the absurd shuttle system.

As a comment - I thought to remove myself if simply meeting only with my wife would eliminate his shyness - but no E JENKINS had made up her mind.
HO HUM!

It took nearly 3 hours I think for the lady to deliver the Zeimer Ultimatum of Evisceration.

Mind you - the dear lady simply - amazingly refused to say why.

• Was it the colour of his hair?
• His winter tan?
• His sporting physique?
• Magnificent baritone voice?

NO – BUT I KNOW WHY!
Note that this is now starting to annoy me - telling you the obvious.
But here goes.

1. ALL the information in these correspondences.
2. ALL the matters we tried in vain to tell her.
3. ALL his basest character so plainly exposed in various documents I tried in vain to give you.
4. ALL the Court Docs I tried in vain to similarly convey
5. ALL his bad faith in probably over 40 discrete events that similary had no gravitas for the woman.
6. ALL - of everything that can be listed wherein he was caught out lying on his many AFFIDAVITS... claims...

ALL CAN BE LISTED> someday soon...

ALL SHOW THAT HE NEVER HAD THE BAREST ELEMENTS OF COMMON DECENCY IN EVER WANTING ANYTHING BUT TO DO HIS WIFE'S BIDDING.

ALL... so much is covered with this word.

And it is so obvious that even in his own solicitors offices the shuttle system was in play - whereby we were there for almost 4 hours to negotiate the pittance of a mere 4 hours contact with the children.

So - who in this world abundant with post modernist claptrap is going to tell me THAT ELIZABETH JENKINS THOUGHT OF IT WITH NO IMPETUS FROM ZEIMER?

The aeronotical aviationery skills of pigs!

THE MAN MUST HAVE DEMANDED CERTAIN CODICILS [that may be a contradiction in terms] from any incipient mediator.

• THE SCIENTOLOGISTS WANTED HIM TO APPLY HIMSELF TO AN E - METER – not good for a person who would not take a lie detector.
• The Muslims wanted thigs untennable even for ZZZZ
• The Jews all knew too much.
• AAAAH the Catholics... do you recall the great Mr Bean video? Why do I change the subject?
• OK – the Catholics with their social – justice imbued minds were just right!!!

Rowan Atkinson in Hell - WITH SUBTITLES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UbqZ_oN5do

4

But WAIT - THERE IS MORE!

If I examined what else she did - possible getting late for today - all the lies she co operated with and manifested - ALL OF THIS FURTHER WILL DIMINISH ANY ASININE CLAIM AS ABOVE.

TO BE CONTINUED

5

Merely I wish to say the woman's formal letter of 16 JUNE was obviously outlandish and fraudulent as well: seen so now.

''I CONFIRM YOUR APPOINTMENT FOR A JOINT FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION..''

I have had enough for the day.

Be aware that I am being so open with you people.

Which is exponentially better than the deliberate - shall we call it 'anomalies' of your people.

Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner