From: g87
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 2:09 PM
Subject: To The Archdiocese Catholic Church: Att Daniel
Feiber
To The Archdiocese Catholic Church
Att Daniel Feiber, Assistant Manager
Catholic Care
cc to Malvern
Catholic Care
Dear Mr Feiber
I thank you for our conversation on Wednesday 15 July about Catholic Care
Malvern.
Within a very short span of time – as a result of above – the Manager at
Malvern NICK phoned me to advise that he and the solicitor / legal advisor of
Malvern wanted to speak with me.
Both of them.
I said my wonderful wife would possibly / probably want to come too.
I will leave it to her; dependant on matters that are for now
immaterial.
That in and of itself was good as far as it went: he even offered to help
by [him] being prepared to issue some of the documents that I sought.
And the latter sadly misreads the situation – which I
said to him or yourself**** requires some sort of genius to
resolve.
Documents are nice: there is a ‘Kruschovian’ quote
defacto rhetorical threat that does not suit me; enjoy the
history!
Khruschev- We will bury you
Indeed – that genius may indeed be Nick.
It is not for me to preempt.
So I decided to create a blog that is not accessible by
google and have pasted all email
correspondences.
I do not know how to post attachments – which sadly means that the
additional explanatory sheets [yellow....etc] sent me with the ORIGINAL
invitation to attend mediation could not be enclosed. AND I TELL YOU – you
should make it your business to discover copies from Malvern.
Nor their letters posted.
As conveyed to yourself and / Nick – there are a number of paradoxes herein
matter. [I did not keep accurate notes of our respective conversations]
I do not really care what they do for a start.
You are kindly invited to examine merely what will be in front of you via
this epistle.
I also advised Nick that your writer has not sought legal advise.
Nick generously thought I should seek it.
Wrong.
I will do whatever I think I need to do: and as one cannot work out what
you intend to do – there is no reason for now or at all to
brief anyone.
Espec re above
I do well without contemplating the barb by the bard about lawyers
Thanks Nick – I know you mean well.
So I go on.
I agreed to meet Nick and the solicitor who was briefed
before THAT lamentable email was sent me by Elizabeth. on 13/7 – having taken 6
days to compose.
Notwithstanding excuses...’’part – time’’....
AND I AM NOT FILLED WITH CONFIDENCE THAT NICK APPRECIATES THAT I WILL BE
DISCUSSING MATTERS WITH SAID SOLICITOR IN ATTENDANCE.
It will not be a fair contest.
In reality I merely wanted to ensure that the Catholic Church is made aware
of what is going on and contemplates that what is needed ids the genious from
the era of the best years of The Reformation?
I mean this well./
****
I did not keep accurate records of our respective conversations.
Kind regards
Geoff Seidner
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.